I am endlessly curious about and fascinated by what seems to be a
generalised belief held by many men that the type of car they drive, the
name given to the work they do, the fabric their clothing is made from
or the leather used to make their shoes (Snake? Really? They don't see
the irony?) conspire to enhance their general attractiveness and the
size of their physical attributes.
Boys, this is not true. Yeah,
that's a cool car (your music sucks and is way too loud) but it doesn't
make a man of you; yeah, your big, fancy title is interesting but
you're probably being paid WAY too much for the actual amount of work
you do and in today's times, post Lehman Bros et al, that title and your
what's written on your pay stub are suspect; your suit is great but the
likelihood you picked it yourself - pretty slim... and those shoes mate? C'mon. As for the physical attributes, let's just say, it's not the
gun, it's the gunner....
Here's a tip, boys: real girls - and
boys - like the colour of your character and the depth of your ethics;
when all the accoutrements are stripped away, without excellent
character and ethics, what is there?